The Ontario government recently mandated that Catholic schools allow students to start Gay Straight Alliance (GSA) clubs, allegedly, to protect kids from bullying. Said the premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty: “There are values that transcend any one faith. … And if you talk to parents, they’ll tell you. They want their kids to be respected and accepted.”
Of course, I reject his very deliberate verbiage. The notion of respect doesn’t “transcend” the cross any more than the “religion” of secularism transcends Christianity. But on with the topic at hand: while the premier appeals to principles the Catholic Church and gay advocacy groups all agree on, like safety and respect for our kids, he conveniently leaves out the rest.
The Catholic Church and groups like GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network), which provides the support to the 4,000-plus GSA’s across North America have a radically different sexual ethic, and thus, a radically different pastoral strategy for raising teens with same-sex attraction. An honest look at those differences shows that the Canadian government is rolling a Trojan horse into Catholic schools under the guise of “anti-bullying.”

Toronto’s Cardinal, Thomas Collins expressed his concern: “Because this model is so closely related to a movement with particular views concerning the human person and the issues of life, people who disagree with those views are understandably concerned that the model can serve as a means not only to address bullying, but to promote the views with which they disagree.”
The “particular views” of the movement that don’t square with Catholicism include a rejection of the notion that homosexual activity is any less natural or normal than heterosexual activity—in other words, a rejection of Judeo-Christian- and natural-law-based thinking about sexual ethics. GLSEN labels such thinking “heterosexism.”
There is a clear push for people with same-sex attraction to identify themselves as “gay,” and thus, inherently different than everyone else. GSA’s commend kids for “coming out of the closet” and letting everyone know what their attractions are, so that their identity is further solidified.
Finally, for most (if not all) gay advocacy groups, it goes without saying that gays should be open to romantic relationships with people of the same sex, and that depriving them of that would be depriving them of love.
And while they may or may not overtly promote sexual activity, GSA’s encourage teens to talk about their sexual “identity” and attractions without any expectation that abstinence be promoted or even discussed. If we think that doesn’t send a clear message to the average teen, we’re kidding ourselves.
The Catholic approach is obviously very different. As far as “sexual identity” is concerned, Blessed Mother Teresa, who started New York’s first AIDS hospice, sums up the Church’s approach. She refused to call people “homosexual,” instead she insisted they be called “friends of Jesus.” In the words of the Ontario Conference of Catholic Bishops, “the orientation of an act is homosexual or heterosexual but the person is not.” A person simply cannot be reduced to or defined by a sexual attraction.